Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Sign in
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • For Lawyers
    For Lawyers
    Here, you’ll find the regulatory trends and hidden market shifts that others miss. You’ll learn where markets (and your clients’ industries) are heading—and how to…
    Show More
    Latest News
    Apple, Meta Refusal to Comply with EU rules May Bring New Fines, But Profits Too
    July 20, 2025
    Getty Images + Shutterstock: A Deal That Puts UK Regulator to the Test
    July 16, 2025
    Meta Bets Big on Smart Glasses, But Money is on Ads, Not Hardware
    July 15, 2025
    OpenAI–Google AI Browser War Exposes Limits of EU Tech Rules
    July 14, 2025
  • For Investors
    For Investors
    Regulatory events move markets—often faster than earnings reports. A merger approval or a hefty fine can send a stock soaring or sinking in a day.…
    Show More
    Latest News
    New EU rules targeting Shein and Temu Likely to Benefit Zalando
    July 18, 2025
    Symrise: How to benefit from a Cartel Investigation
    July 16, 2025
    Bank Pekao: On Its Way to lead Poland’s financial sector
    July 14, 2025
    Nexi: Solid Numbers With Regulatory Events as Catalysts
    July 14, 2025
  • News
    News
    Stay informed with our global antitrust news compilation—bringing you the latest developments, regulatory updates, and key cases from around the world, all in one place
    Show More
    Latest News
    Zuckerberg, Meta Executives Settle $8 Billion Privacy Lawsuit
    July 18, 2025
    Turkish Authority Opens Antitrust Probe into Mastercard and Visa
    July 18, 2025
    Malaysia Fines Three Contractors for Bid Rigging
    July 17, 2025
    EU to Launch Antitrust Probe into Universal’s Downtown Music Deal
    July 17, 2025
  • Why Join?
  • Memberships
Reading: EU Defends Digital Markets Act, Denies Targeting U.S. Tech Giants
Font ResizerAa
Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Search
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • Why Join?
  • Memberships
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
News

EU Defends Digital Markets Act, Denies Targeting U.S. Tech Giants

Editorial
Last updated: March 10, 2025 9:45 am
Editorial
Published March 10, 2025
Share
Photo by Christian Lue on Unsplash

The European Union (EU) has pushed back against claims that its new Digital Markets Act (DMA) unfairly targets U.S. tech giants, asserting that the legislation is designed to maintain open digital markets rather than penalize American companies. 

In a letter dated March 6, EU antitrust chief Teresa Ribera and tech chief Henna Virkkunnen responded to concerns raised by U.S. House Judiciary Chair Jim Jordan and Representative Scott Fitzgerald, emphasizing that the DMA applies to all companies meeting its criteria, regardless of their country of origin, Reuters reported.

The DMA, which came into force to prevent dominant tech firms from engaging in anti-competitive behavior, defines so-called “gatekeepers”—companies that control key digital services. Ribera and Virkkunnen stressed that the rules apply universally, not just to U.S. firms.

“The DMA does not target U.S. companies,” they wrote in their letter. “It applies to all companies which fulfill the clearly defined criteria for being designated as a gatekeeper in the European Union, irrespective of where they are headquartered.”

The EU officials also rejected accusations that the law stifles innovation, arguing instead that it fosters competition by preventing dominant firms from imposing unfair practices on smaller competitors. “By preventing gatekeepers from engaging in unfair practices vis-à-vis smaller companies, the DMA keeps the door open to the next wave of innovation in vital digital markets,” they said.

Ribera and Virkkunnen pointed to U.S. regulatory actions against Big Tech to illustrate that concerns about monopolistic behavior are not unique to the EU. They highlighted recent U.S. antitrust investigations and lawsuits filed against Alphabet (Google), Amazon, Apple, and Meta Platforms, many of which originated under the first Trump administration.

These cases, they argued, demonstrate that the need to regulate dominant tech firms is widely recognized and not a European initiative aimed at American businesses.

The EU leaders also rejected suggestions that antitrust fines imposed on tech giants function as a hidden tax on U.S. companies. Their comments come after former President Donald Trump threatened tariffs on countries imposing fines on American firms.

“The objective of DMA enforcement, as in any other piece of EU law, is to ensure compliance – not to issue fines,” they wrote. “Possible sanctions, also common to U.S. laws and regulations, are not an end in themselves but a prerequisite for credible engagement.”

You Might Also Like

Spain’s CNMC Investigates Generali and Sanitas, Suspected Collusion

EU To Open Office in Silicon Valley

Japan FTC Orders Google to Cease Android Search Service Practices

Procter & Gamble Identified in EU Antitrust Probe Alongside Coca-Cola Bottlers

Portuguese Brisa Plans Full Acquisition of Via Verde

TAGGED:Alphabetamazonantitrustapplebig techdigital markets actEUU.S. antitrust investigationsU.S. tech giants

Weekly Newsletter

Insights you can turn into money or clients
Investors

New EU rules targeting Shein and Temu Likely to Benefit Zalando

Editorial
Editorial
July 18, 2025
Symrise: How to benefit from a Cartel Investigation
Antitrust Intelligence

About Us

We identify and quantify regulatory risks so you can take better decisions
Menu
  • Lawyers
  • Investors
  • News
  • My Bookmarks
  • About Us
  • Contact
Legals
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Subscribe Us

Subscribe to our newsletter to get weekly ideas to make money and get new clients!

© 2025 Antitrust Intelligence. All Rights Reserved. - Web design Málaga by Seb creativos
Antitrust Intelligence
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Antitrust & Financial Markets? Download Your Free Guide NOW
Five tips to find unique regulatory intelligence
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?