Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Prices
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • What We Offer?
    • Training
    • Intelligence
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • Antitrust Club
Reading: EU Commission Opens In-Depth Probe into UMG’s Planned Acquisition of Downtown
Font ResizerAa
Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Search
  • What We Offer?
    • Training
    • Intelligence
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • Antitrust Club
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
News

EU Commission Opens In-Depth Probe into UMG’s Planned Acquisition of Downtown

Editorial
Last updated: July 22, 2025 2:33 pm
Editorial
Published July 22, 2025
Share
Image by Fabian from Pixabay

The European Commission has initiated an in-depth investigation under the EU Merger Regulation concerning Universal Music Group’s (UMG) proposed acquisition of Downtown. The Commission’s preliminary assessment raises concerns that the transaction may lessen competition in the European Economic Area (EEA) wholesale market for recorded music distribution by granting UMG access to commercially sensitive data from rival record labels. Additionally, the Commission is concerned that the acquisition could diminish competition in the artist and label (A&L) services market by removing a significant competitor.

Background of the Transaction

UMG is a global leader in music recording, publishing, merchandising, and audiovisual content, headquartered in the Netherlands. Downtown, headquartered in the United States, operates internationally and provides A&L services to independent record companies and artists, notably via its FUGA music distribution platform. Downtown also offers royalty accounting and rights management services through its Curve platform, which handles processing, accounting, payment, and distribution related to royalties.

Preliminary Concerns

The Commission’s initial investigation suggests that Downtown processes commercially sensitive data from third-party record labels. If acquired by UMG, the latter could gain both the ability and incentive to use this sensitive data for its own business interests, particularly in recorded music distribution. This could harm rival labels and potentially consolidate UMG’s already dominant position in the EEA wholesale distribution market.

Moreover, the transaction may eliminate Downtown as an important competitive force in the A&L services sector, which includes distribution, monetisation, marketing, promotion, and data analytics services to artists and labels.

Next Steps

The Commission will conduct an in-depth Phase II investigation to thoroughly evaluate the transaction’s impact on competition and to confirm or dispel its preliminary concerns. The proposed acquisition was notified to the Commission on 16 May 2025, which now has until 26 November 2025 (90 working days) to reach a decision.

It is important to note that opening this investigation does not prejudge the outcome.

Jurisdiction and Referral

Though the transaction did not meet the EU Merger Regulation’s turnover thresholds, it was notified in Austria and the Netherlands due to national rules. Following a referral request from the Dutch competition authority, accepted by the Commission and joined by Austria, the investigation will focus on the effects of the acquisition within these Member States under EU rules.

Context on Merger Control

Under the EU Merger Regulation, the Commission reviews mergers that meet turnover thresholds to prevent concentrations that could significantly impede effective competition in the EEA or a substantial part of it. Most mergers are cleared after initial review, but where concerns arise, the Commission may open an in-depth Phase II investigation.

Currently, the Commission is also examining another merger in Phase II: Mars’ proposed acquisition of Kellanova.

Further details on this case, registered under case number M.11956, are available on the Commission’s competition website.

Commissioner’s Statement

Valdis Dombrovskis, Commissioner for Economy and Productivity, noted:
“By acquiring Downtown, UMG would purchase a large provider of services for labels that compete with UMG and for artists. Opening an in-depth investigation will allow us to assess more carefully whether this acquisition would have a negative impact on artists, labels and, ultimately, European consumers.“

You Might Also Like

Hungarian Competition Authority Identifies Key Factors Driving Milk and Egg Price Surges

EU Court Sides with Qualcomm in $1Bn Antitrust Fine

UK Tribunal Certifies Collective Action Against Google in Android App Store Case

Chile asks the TDLC to lift restrictions on the VTR–Metrópolis Intercom merger after 20 years

EU Antitrust Regulators Temporarily Suspend Inquiry into IAG’s Air Europa Acquisition

TAGGED:acquisitiondowntownEUeuropean commissionprobeUMGUniversal

Weekly Newsletter

Insights you can turn into money or clients
Investors

Zalando’s EU Court Loss Harmless; Real Threats Are Weak Demand, Shein and Temu

Editorial
Editorial
September 4, 2025
Covestro’s 10% Drop: Merger Arbitrage Opportunity or Value Trap?
Antitrust Intelligence

About Us

We identify and quantify regulatory risks so you can take better decisions
Menu
  • Lawyers
  • Investors
  • News
  • My Bookmarks
  • About Us
  • Contact
Legals
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Subscribe Us

Subscribe to our newsletter to get weekly ideas to make money and get new clients!

© 2025 Antitrust Intelligence. All Rights Reserved. - Web design Málaga by Seb creativos
Antitrust Intelligence
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Antitrust & Financial Markets? Download Your Free Guide NOW
Five tips to find unique regulatory intelligence
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?