Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Prices
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • What We Offer?
    • Training
    • Intelligence
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • Antitrust Club
Reading: Epic Games Wins Partial Victory in Australian Antitrust Case Against Apple and Google
Font ResizerAa
Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Search
  • What We Offer?
    • Training
    • Intelligence
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • Antitrust Club
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
News

Epic Games Wins Partial Victory in Australian Antitrust Case Against Apple and Google

Editorial
Last updated: August 12, 2025 12:52 pm
Editorial
Published August 12, 2025
Share
Photo by appshunter.io on Unsplash

Epic Games, the developer of the hit online game Fortnite, secured a partial victory in an Australian Federal Court case accusing Apple Inc. (NASDAQ: AAPL) and Google LLC (NASDAQ: GOOGL) of anti-competitive conduct in the operation of their app stores.

In a decision delivered by Justice Jonathan Beach, the court upheld key elements of Epic’s claim that Apple and Google breached Australian competition laws by misusing their market power and engaging in restrictive trade practices. The court found that the companies’ dominance in the smartphone app market had the effect of substantially lessening competition in breach of Australian law, APnews reported.

However, the court rejected other aspects of Epic’s case, including allegations that Apple and Google engaged in “unconscionable conduct” as defined under Australian law. The full judgment—spanning more than 2,000 pages—was not released on Tuesday, but local media reported that the court concluded the companies had not intentionally breached the law.

Epic’s lawsuit, filed in 2020, followed the removal of Fortnite from both the App Store and Google Play Store after Epic introduced a direct payment feature that bypassed the platforms’ payment systems. The gaming company argued that Apple’s and Google’s commission fees were excessive and that their restrictions effectively prevented users from accessing alternative app stores.

In a post on social media platform X, Epic said the court had “found that Apple and Google abuse their control over app distribution and in-app payments to limit competition,” adding that Fortnite and the Epic Games Store would return to iOS in Australia. “This is a WIN for developers and consumers in Australia!” the company wrote.

Apple welcomed the court’s dismissal of certain claims but said it “strongly disagreed” with other findings. “Apple faces fierce competition in every market where we operate,” the company said in a statement.

Google similarly said it welcomed the rejection of some of Epic’s claims but disagreed with the court’s characterisation of its billing policies and historical partnerships. “We will review the full decision when we receive it and assess our next steps,” Google stated.

Epic’s legal battle with Apple and Google spans multiple jurisdictions, including the United States and the United Kingdom, and represents one of the most high-profile global challenges to the business models of dominant app store operators.

You Might Also Like

UK Tribunal Certifies Collective Action Against Google in Android App Store Case

 eToro Europe fined 1.3 million euros in Italy

Uber Ends Acquisition of Foodpanda Taiwan Following Regulatory Hurdles

BlackRock Raises Stake in Telecom Italia to 5.1%

Apple, Google Aren’t Happy with Australia’s Competition Reform

TAGGED:app storesappleAustraliaepic gamesgoogle

Weekly Newsletter

Insights you can turn into money or clients
Investors

Zalando’s EU Court Loss Harmless; Real Threats Are Weak Demand, Shein and Temu

Editorial
Editorial
September 4, 2025
Covestro’s 10% Drop: Merger Arbitrage Opportunity or Value Trap?
Antitrust Intelligence

About Us

We identify and quantify regulatory risks so you can take better decisions
Menu
  • Lawyers
  • Investors
  • News
  • My Bookmarks
  • About Us
  • Contact
Legals
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Subscribe Us

Subscribe to our newsletter to get weekly ideas to make money and get new clients!

© 2025 Antitrust Intelligence. All Rights Reserved. - Web design Málaga by Seb creativos
Antitrust Intelligence
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Antitrust & Financial Markets? Download Your Free Guide NOW
Five tips to find unique regulatory intelligence
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?