Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Prices
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • What it is?
  • Antitrust Club
    • What it is?
Reading: Eight EU Member States Urge Swift Action Against Territorial Supply Constraints
Font ResizerAa
Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Search
  • What it is?
  • Antitrust Club
    • What it is?
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
News

Eight EU Member States Urge Swift Action Against Territorial Supply Constraints

Editorial
Last updated: September 30, 2025 9:11 am
Editorial
Published September 30, 2025
Share
Photo by Masood Aslami on Unsplash

A coalition of eight European Union Member States has called on the European Commission to accelerate efforts to eliminate unjustified territorial supply constraints (TSCs), warning that such practices undermine the integrity of the Single Market and impose significant costs on consumers.

Austria, Belgium, Czechia, Croatia, Greece, Luxembourg, the Netherlands and Slovenia submitted a joint non-paper ahead of today’s Competitiveness Council meeting, urging the Commission to deliver concrete proposals well before its planned timeline of late 2026.

Territorial supply constraints occur when multinational suppliers restrict wholesalers and retailers from purchasing goods across borders, effectively segmenting markets along national lines. According to the signatories, these practices inflate consumer prices, particularly in smaller and mid-sized Member States, reduce competitive pressures and distort the principles of Europe’s internal market. While some price differences across Member States can be explained by logistics costs, legal requirements or consumer preferences, the coalition stressed that many disparities instead reflect deliberate strategies to maximise supplier profits.

The Commission itself has estimated that unjustified territorial supply constraints cost EU consumers more than €14 billion annually, with disproportionate burdens falling on smaller markets where retailers have limited bargaining power. The eight Member States warned that recent inflationary pressures have exacerbated the negative effects of such practices. “Citizens across the Union, especially in smaller Member States, are directly confronted with excessive prices caused by unjustified TSCs,” the non-paper states. “Political credibility demands that the EU act sooner and more decisively.”

The governments argued that persistently high consumer prices, rising inflationary pressures and the erosion of trust in the Single Market are the inevitable results of continued inaction. They urged the Commission to make the fight against territorial supply constraints a top policy priority, insisting that concrete measures be presented well before the end of 2026. They further called for an EU-wide register of territorial supply constraint examples, a faster and more decisive enforcement of competition law, closer cooperation between the Commission and national competition authorities within the European Competition Network, and legal clarification to ensure that such practices are explicitly recognised as unlawful under EU law. The evaluation of Regulation 1/2003, they suggested, should be used to identify loopholes and bottlenecks, while greater attention should also be paid to whether the definition of market power could be extended to cover territorial supply constraints at Union level.

The signatories also pressed the Commission to address additional barriers that may contribute to territorial supply constraints, including national labelling requirements and rules that can be misused to keep markets segmented. They further suggested that, where competition law proves insufficient, new legislative measures should be considered, including the possibility of addressing harmful supply restrictions within the ongoing revision of the Unfair Trading Practices Directive.

Framing the issue as a core test of European integration, the Member States warned that the Single Market cannot be a success if dominant multinational suppliers are allowed to partition it for profit. The Commission has already launched investigations and fact-finding exercises into territorial supply constraints, but pressure is now mounting for more urgent legislative and enforcement action.

You Might Also Like

Australia Urges New Digital Laws to Tackle Big Tech in Final Inquiry Report

Sellers on Amazon, Walmart’s Flipkart Targeted in India’s Antitrust Raids

Glovo Morocco Reaches Settlement with Competition Council over Antitrust Allegations

Australia Opens Competition Probe into Potential Lactalis–Fonterra Deal

US Sets Stage for Antitrust Probes into Microsoft, OpenAI, and Nvidia

TAGGED:competitionEUmember statessingle marketterritorial supply constraints

Weekly Newsletter

Insights you can turn into money or clients
Financial Analysis

Getty Stock Raises 10% In a Day, But October Will Be Bumpy

Editorial
Editorial
October 5, 2025
Which Cartellist is a “Buy” Opportunity?
Antitrust Intelligence

About Us

We identify and quantify regulatory risks so you can take better decisions
Menu
  • Insights
  • Financial Analysis
  • News
  • My Bookmarks
  • About Us
  • Contact
Legals
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Subscribe Us

Subscribe to our newsletter to get weekly ideas to make money and get new clients!

© 2025 Antitrust Intelligence. All Rights Reserved. - Web design Málaga by Seb creativos
Antitrust Intelligence
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Antitrust & Financial Markets? Download Your Free Guide NOW
Five tips to find unique regulatory intelligence
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?