Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Prices
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • What We Offer?
    • Training
    • Intelligence
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • Antitrust Club
Reading: DuckDuckGo CEO Criticizes Google Antitrust Remedies as Inadequate
Font ResizerAa
Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Search
  • What We Offer?
    • Training
    • Intelligence
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • Antitrust Club
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
News

DuckDuckGo CEO Criticizes Google Antitrust Remedies as Inadequate

Editorial
Last updated: September 8, 2025 9:04 am
Editorial
Published September 8, 2025
Share
https://duckduckgo.com/press

DuckDuckGo CEO Gabriel Weinberg has strongly condemned the remedies imposed on Google in the latest U.S. antitrust ruling, arguing that the measures fail to address the company’s entrenched monopoly in search.

Contents
Court Ruling Stops Short of Structural BreakupIndustry Concerns Over AI CompetitionDuckDuckGo’s Position in the Market

Weinberg issued his statement late on September 2 via social media, where it quickly attracted over 230,000 views. It marks the privacy-focused search engine’s first public response to U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta’s September 2 decision outlining remedies in Google’s landmark antitrust case.

“We do not believe the remedies ordered by the court will force the changes necessary to adequately address Google’s illegal behavior,” Weinberg wrote, adding that the decision leaves Google free to “hold back competitors, including in AI search.”

Court Ruling Stops Short of Structural Breakup

Judge Mehta’s 230-page ruling requires Google to increase transparency in its advertising auctions, provide competitors with enhanced access to search index data, and end certain exclusive distribution agreements. Existing contracts must be modified by September 10, 2025.

The decision, however, rejected demands for more sweeping remedies such as the divestiture of Google’s Chrome browser. The Department of Justice and several states had sought such structural remedies, arguing they were necessary to restore competition in digital markets.

The case is part of a series of legal setbacks for Google. In August 2024, Judge Mehta concluded that the company illegally maintained monopolies in general search services and search advertising. In April 2025, a Virginia court separately ruled that Google had monopolized digital advertising technology markets.

Industry Concerns Over AI Competition

Weinberg’s criticism reflects growing concern in the tech industry that behavioral remedies—such as transparency requirements and licensing obligations—are insufficient to curb Google’s market dominance. He specifically pointed to artificial intelligence search, warning that Google remains positioned to suppress rivals in this emerging sector.

AI-driven search platforms have gained traction amid shifting user preferences. Analysts predict conversational AI could overtake traditional search by 2030. Apple’s recent decision to integrate OpenAI’s ChatGPT, rather than Google’s Gemini, into iPhone search features underscores how antitrust scrutiny is already influencing corporate partnerships. Competing platforms like Perplexity AI have also reported increased opportunities as a result of Google’s regulatory troubles.

DuckDuckGo’s Position in the Market

Despite heightened attention to privacy, DuckDuckGo continues to face an uphill battle against Google’s dominance. The company records approximately 9 million monthly downloads across mobile and desktop devices, but its global market share remains a fraction of Google’s, which stands at about 87 percent.

Weinberg concluded his statement with a call for legislative action:

“We believe Congress should now step in to swiftly make Google do the thing it fears the most: compete on a level playing field.”

You Might Also Like

OpenAI Challenges Chrome with AI Browser Launch

Hungarian Competition Authority Identifies Key Factors Driving Milk and Egg Price Surges

New EU Guidelines Revise When Competitors Can Cooperate

Brazil’s CADE Opens Probe Into Anglo American’s $500 Million Nickel Sale

Australia Sues Aldi Vegetable Suppliers Over Alleged Cartel

TAGGED:aiantitrustbig techCEODuckDuckGogoogleremediesWeinberg

Weekly Newsletter

Insights you can turn into money or clients
Investors

Zalando’s EU Court Loss Harmless; Real Threats Are Weak Demand, Shein and Temu

Editorial
Editorial
September 4, 2025
Covestro’s 10% Drop: Merger Arbitrage Opportunity or Value Trap?
Antitrust Intelligence

About Us

We identify and quantify regulatory risks so you can take better decisions
Menu
  • Lawyers
  • Investors
  • News
  • My Bookmarks
  • About Us
  • Contact
Legals
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Subscribe Us

Subscribe to our newsletter to get weekly ideas to make money and get new clients!

© 2025 Antitrust Intelligence. All Rights Reserved. - Web design Málaga by Seb creativos
Antitrust Intelligence
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Antitrust & Financial Markets? Download Your Free Guide NOW
Five tips to find unique regulatory intelligence
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?