Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Prices
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • Antitrust Intelligence
  • Antitrust Club
  • Antitrust Investor
Reading: Consumers Accuse Microsoft of Antitrust Violations Linked to OpenAI Deal
Font ResizerAa
Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Search
  • Antitrust Intelligence
  • Antitrust Club
  • Antitrust Investor
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
News

Consumers Accuse Microsoft of Antitrust Violations Linked to OpenAI Deal

Editorial
Last updated: October 14, 2025 9:39 am
Editorial
Published October 14, 2025
Share
Consumers Accuse Microsoft of Antitrust Violations Linked to OpenAI Deal

Microsoft Corporation is facing a proposed class action lawsuit filed by U.S. consumers who claim the company’s multi-billion-dollar partnership with OpenAI violated federal antitrust law by restricting competition and inflating prices in the fast-growing generative artificial intelligence (AI) market.

The lawsuit, Samuel Bryant et al. v. Microsoft Corp., filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California (Case No. 3:25-cv-08733), accuses Microsoft of using its exclusive cloud computing agreement with OpenAI to limit the availability of the computational resources needed to operate ChatGPT, OpenAI’s flagship AI product.

According to the complaint, Microsoft’s investment—reportedly exceeding $13 billion—and its exclusive cloud partnership on the Azure platform enabled the company to exert control over OpenAI’s operations in ways that restrained market competition. The plaintiffs, represented by attorneys Yavar Bathaee and Brian Dunne of Bathaee Dunne, allege that this arrangement artificially increased ChatGPT subscription prices and degraded product quality for millions of users.

The complaint further contends that although some of the alleged restrictions have been relaxed, Microsoft continues to hold significant influence over OpenAI, describing this influence as “a sword of Damocles over OpenAI wielded by one of its principal competitors.”

Microsoft issued a statement responding to the filing, saying:

“We believe that our OpenAI partnership promotes competition, innovation, and responsible AI development.”

The company added that it is still reviewing the lawsuit. OpenAI, which is not named as a defendant, declined to comment on the litigation, Reuters reported.

The case also alleges that Microsoft exploited its early agreement with OpenAI to both profit from the company’s success and simultaneously develop its own competing AI products, such as Copilot, which integrates generative AI across Microsoft’s productivity suite.

The plaintiffs claim that during a price war in early 2025, ChatGPT’s subscription prices were substantially higher than those of rival services, allegedly due to the restrictive effects of Microsoft’s control over OpenAI’s computing resources. The restrictions were reportedly eased in June 2025, when OpenAI began purchasing compute power from Google, reducing Microsoft’s exclusive control.

The proposed class seeks damages for alleged overcharges dating back to the launch of ChatGPT in November 2022, as well as an injunction prohibiting Microsoft from reinstating the disputed contractual restrictions.

Microsoft first announced its partnership with OpenAI in 2019, pledging an initial $1 billion investment and a commitment to build advanced AI supercomputing capabilities on Azure. At the time, OpenAI was still structured as a nonprofit, though it has since reorganized as a for-profit entity with capped investor returns.

No appearance has yet been entered for the defendant.

You Might Also Like

EU Orders Apple to Open Up iOS to Smartphones and Wearables

Italian Competition Authority Fines GLS Group €8 Million for Misleading Green Practices

AliExpress Korea Fined for Deceptive Pricing Practices

FTC Updates Endorsement Guides to Prevent Fake Reviews

Apple Urges EU to Repeal Digital Markets Act Over Feature Delays and Security Risks

TAGGED:aiantitrustbig techconsumersmicrosoftOpenAIU.S. District CourtUSA

Weekly Newsletter

Insights you can turn into money or clients
Financial Analysis

Shares Fall 8% After CMA Decision — Getty–Shutterstock May Become a Buying Opportunity

Editorial
Editorial
October 21, 2025
CVS Group Rises 13% in One Month, Though the CMA Market Study Didn’t Help
Antitrust Intelligence

About Us

We identify and quantify regulatory risks so you can take better decisions
Menu
  • Insights
  • Financial Analysis
  • News
  • My Bookmarks
  • About Us
  • Contact
Legals
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Subscribe Us

Subscribe to our newsletter to get weekly ideas to make money and get new clients!

© 2025 Antitrust Intelligence. All Rights Reserved. - Web design Málaga by Seb creativos
Antitrust Intelligence
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Antitrust & Financial Markets? Download Your Free Guide NOW
Five tips to find unique regulatory intelligence
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?