Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Prices
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • What We Offer?
    • Training
    • Intelligence
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • Antitrust Club
Reading: Colombia Opens Antitrust Investigation Into Apple’s App Store Rules
Font ResizerAa
Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Search
  • What We Offer?
    • Training
    • Intelligence
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • Antitrust Club
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
News

Colombia Opens Antitrust Investigation Into Apple’s App Store Rules

Editorial
Last updated: August 28, 2025 7:26 am
Editorial
Published August 28, 2025
Share
Photo by Алекс Арцибашев on Unsplash

Colombia has joined a growing list of jurisdictions scrutinizing Apple Inc.’s control over its app ecosystem, opening a formal investigation into whether the company abused its dominant position in the distribution of digital goods on iPhones and iPads.

The Superintendence of Industry and Commerce (SIC), Colombia’s competition regulator, announced that its Delegation for Competition Protection issued a statement of charges against Apple Inc. and Apple Services Latam LLC on August 19. The authority said its preliminary findings suggest Apple may have used its market power to impose restrictions that hindered competition, in violation of Colombian law.

According to the SIC, Apple required app developers to distribute their products exclusively through its App Store, prohibiting the creation of rival platforms or alternative app stores. By restricting developers from bypassing Apple’s ecosystem, the company allegedly preserved a de facto monopoly over app distribution on iOS and iPadOS.

The probe also centers on Apple’s in-app purchase system, which developers must use to sell digital services and subscriptions. Regulators said Apple barred developers from offering other payment methods or even informing users about cheaper alternatives, ensuring all transactions flowed through its proprietary platform. Apple charges a commission of between 15% and 30% on these purchases, a practice long criticized by developers as excessive.

The SIC said these contractual requirements may have created artificial barriers for new entrants, raised costs for consumers, and degraded the user experience by restricting payment options and limiting access to information. The authority stressed that such practices could have significant negative effects on innovation and consumer welfare in Colombia’s fast-growing digital economy.

The Colombian investigation mirrors antitrust battles Apple has faced elsewhere. In the United States, the Department of Justice filed a landmark lawsuit earlier this year accusing the company of monopolizing the smartphone market. In Europe, regulators have fined Apple for restricting competition in music streaming and are enforcing new rules under the Digital Markets Act that require the company to open its ecosystem to alternative app stores and payment systems. Authorities in South Korea and Japan have also pressed the company to loosen its in-app purchase rules.

For Colombia, the case signals the regulator’s willingness to confront global tech giants and test the boundaries of its competition framework in digital markets. While no penalties have yet been imposed, the proceedings could force Apple to alter its business practices in the country, potentially setting a precedent for Latin America, where regulatory oversight of digital platforms is still developing.

“The launch of this investigation reaffirms our commitment to protecting free competition in digital markets and safeguarding consumer welfare,” the SIC said in a statement.

Apple has not yet commented publicly on the Colombian probe. The company has previously defended its App Store rules as necessary to ensure security, privacy and a reliable user experience. Still, as regulators from Bogotá to Brussels increase pressure, Apple faces mounting challenges to a business model that has helped turn the App Store into one of the company’s most lucrative revenue streams.

You Might Also Like

Google, Facebook, Amazon Push For New Antitrust Markets

UK Tribunal Certifies Collective Action Against Google in Android App Store Case

UK’s CMA Clears Iberdrola’s Acquisition of NWEN

Bulgaria’s Watchdog Probes Sunflower Oil Market Amid Price Concerns

France Fines Firms with €29.5 Million For No-Poaching Agreements Following EU’s Steps with Delivery Hero

TAGGED:antitrustapp storeappleColombiadigital goodsdominant positionSIC

Weekly Newsletter

Insights you can turn into money or clients
Investors

Covestro’s 10% Drop: Merger Arbitrage Opportunity or Value Trap?

Editorial
Editorial
September 9, 2025
Zalando’s EU Court Loss Harmless; Real Threats Are Weak Demand, Shein and Temu
Antitrust Intelligence

About Us

We identify and quantify regulatory risks so you can take better decisions
Menu
  • Lawyers
  • Investors
  • News
  • My Bookmarks
  • About Us
  • Contact
Legals
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Subscribe Us

Subscribe to our newsletter to get weekly ideas to make money and get new clients!

© 2025 Antitrust Intelligence. All Rights Reserved. - Web design Málaga by Seb creativos
Antitrust Intelligence
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Antitrust & Financial Markets? Download Your Free Guide NOW
Five tips to find unique regulatory intelligence
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?