Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Prices
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • Antitrust Intelligence
  • Antitrust Club
  • Antitrust Investor
Reading: Brazil’s Antitrust Authority Recommends Sanctions Against Apple
Font ResizerAa
Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Search
  • Antitrust Intelligence
  • Antitrust Club
  • Antitrust Investor
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
apple
News

Brazil’s Antitrust Authority Recommends Sanctions Against Apple

Editorial
Last updated: July 1, 2025 4:35 pm
Editorial
Published July 1, 2025
Share
Photo by Daniel Lengies: https://www.pexels.com/photo/an-ipad-and-iphone-on-wooden-table-beside-a-cacti-in-white-pot-11055857/

The General Superintendence of Brazil’s Administrative Council for Economic Defense (SG/Cade) issued a formal recommendation on Monday (30) for the conviction of Apple Inc. over alleged anticompetitive practices within its iOS digital ecosystem. The move follows a multi-year investigation into the company’s conduct in the Brazilian mobile application distribution market.

The investigation, launched in 2022 after a complaint by Ebazar.com.br Ltda. and Mercado Libre, focused on Apple’s imposition of restrictions on app developers. In particular, the authority scrutinized Apple’s requirement that all transactions for digital goods and services be processed exclusively through its proprietary payment system, as well as the prohibition of third-party digital service sales on iOS platforms.

According to SG/Cade, Apple’s conduct creates “artificial barriers to entry” for competitors, effectively consolidating its dominance in the mobile app ecosystem and limiting both developer and consumer choice. The Superintendence concluded that these practices amount to an abuse of dominant position, in violation of Brazil’s Competition Law (Law No. 12,529/2011).

The recommendation includes the imposition of a fine and a series of behavioral remedies intended to dismantle the anticompetitive restrictions identified during the investigation. These measures aim to restore competitive conditions by compelling Apple to cease the investigated practices and implement changes to reduce their long-term effects.

The case now proceeds to Cade’s Tribunal, where it will be reviewed by Counselor Victor Fernandes. Fernandes had previously reviewed Apple’s appeal against a preventive measure issued during the investigation. The final decision rests with the Court, which may either dismiss the case or confirm the violation and impose penalties accordingly.

If upheld, the ruling could mark a significant precedent in digital market regulation in Brazil, signaling increased scrutiny of platform-based business models that exert tight control over access, distribution, and payment systems.

You Might Also Like

Czech Competition Office Rules Out Dominance in WEEE Systems

EU Takes Action on Safer and Fairer E-Commerce

Tyson Foods to Pay $85M in Major Pork Price-Fixing Settlement

Banco Sabadell’s CEO Says BBVA’s acquisition will derail

$3 Billion Power Move: OpenAI Targets Windsurf for AI Coding Edge

TAGGED:appleBrazilCADEdigital ecosystemiOSsanctionsSG

Weekly Newsletter

Insights you can turn into money or clients
Antitrust Intelligence

About Us

We identify and quantify regulatory risks so you can take better decisions
Menu
  • Insights
  • Financial Analysis
  • News
  • My Bookmarks
  • About Us
  • Contact
Legals
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Subscribe Us

Subscribe to our newsletter to get weekly ideas to make money and get new clients!

© 2025 Antitrust Intelligence. All Rights Reserved. - Web design Málaga by Seb creativos
Antitrust Intelligence
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Antitrust & Financial Markets? Download Your Free Guide NOW
Five tips to find unique regulatory intelligence
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?