Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Prices
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • What We Offer?
    • Training
    • Intelligence
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • Antitrust Club
Reading: BPER–BPSO Merger Faces Deeper Italian Antitrust Scrutiny
Font ResizerAa
Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Search
  • What We Offer?
    • Training
    • Intelligence
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • Antitrust Club
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
News

BPER–BPSO Merger Faces Deeper Italian Antitrust Scrutiny

Editorial
Last updated: June 11, 2025 9:10 pm
Editorial
Published April 17, 2025
Share
Photo by Sora Shimazaki: https://www.pexels.com/photo/crop-colleagues-shaking-hands-in-office-5673488/

On April 8, 2025, the Italian Competition Authority (AGCM) initiated a Phase II investigation into the proposed acquisition of exclusive control over Banca Popolare di Sondrio S.p.A. (BPSO) by BPER Banca S.p.A. (BPER).

The transaction is set to occur through a voluntary public exchange offer made by BPER for all shares of BPSO (Case C12710 – BPER Banca/Banca Popolare di Sondrio).

This operation falls within the broader context of ongoing consolidation in the Italian financial and banking sector. According to the parties, the deal aims primarily to generate cost and revenue synergies across various operational areas of the combined entity.

The acquisition involves several relevant markets within the traditional banking sector, including deposit-taking and lending, as well as in areas such as asset management, consumer credit, factoring, leasing, payment services, and insurance.

Based on preliminary findings, the AGCM has determined that the transaction may significantly impede effective competition in specific local markets—particularly those concerning lending services to households and small businesses in the provinces of Varese, Pavia, and Como.

In these local markets, the combined market position of the post-merger entity and the existing level of market concentration raise concerns regarding potential anti-competitive effects. As a result, the Authority deemed it necessary to proceed with a more detailed examination of the deal.

Conversely, the transaction does not appear likely to alter competitive dynamics in other relevant markets.

The Phase II review will allow the AGCM to further assess the potential impact of the acquisition before issuing a final decision.

You Might Also Like

Leipzig Court Orders Meta to Pay €5,000 in Facebook Data Privacy Case

Perplexity AI Launches $34.5B Bid for Chrome as Google Faces Antitrust Divestiture Pressure

UK Regulators Move to Curb Apple and Google’s Grip on Mobile Markets

Mexico Closes Google’s Investigation Distancing from US, EU Precedents

Broadcom’s $61 Billion VMware Bid May Get EU approval, Sources

TAGGED:acquisitionbankBPERBPOSitaly

Weekly Newsletter

Insights you can turn into money or clients
Investors

Covestro’s 10% Drop: Merger Arbitrage Opportunity or Value Trap?

Editorial
Editorial
September 9, 2025
Zalando’s EU Court Loss Harmless; Real Threats Are Weak Demand, Shein and Temu
Antitrust Intelligence

About Us

We identify and quantify regulatory risks so you can take better decisions
Menu
  • Lawyers
  • Investors
  • News
  • My Bookmarks
  • About Us
  • Contact
Legals
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Subscribe Us

Subscribe to our newsletter to get weekly ideas to make money and get new clients!

© 2025 Antitrust Intelligence. All Rights Reserved. - Web design Málaga by Seb creativos
Antitrust Intelligence
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Antitrust & Financial Markets? Download Your Free Guide NOW
Five tips to find unique regulatory intelligence
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?