Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Prices
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • What We Offer?
    • Training
    • Intelligence
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • Antitrust Club
Reading: Amazon Responds to the FTC lawsuit
Font ResizerAa
Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Search
  • What We Offer?
    • Training
    • Intelligence
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • Antitrust Club
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
News

Amazon Responds to the FTC lawsuit

Editorial
Last updated: March 10, 2025 9:45 am
Editorial
Published October 4, 2023
Share

Amazon responds to the U.S. Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) lawsuit against the company, asserting that the allegations are misguided and that their business practices benefit consumers and promote competition.

Photo by Bryan Angelo on Unsplash

Amazon expresses respect for the FTC’s role in consumer protection and competition but disagrees with the current FTC’s approach in filing the lawsuit.

Key Points:

  1. Amazon’s Commitment to Low Prices: Amazon argues that their pricing practices and efforts to highlight competitively priced offers are pro-competitive and result in lower prices for consumers. They emphasize their dedication to providing competitive prices and assisting third-party sellers in achieving the same.
  2. Supporting Independent Sellers: Amazon highlights its successful model of inviting third-party sellers to operate on its platform, which has led to these sellers accounting for over 60% of sales on Amazon. The company provides various services, including Fulfillment by Amazon (FBA), to help these sellers succeed.
  3. Fulfillment by Amazon (FBA): Amazon’s FBA service is presented as an optional, competitive advantage for sellers, with cost-effective pricing and logistical support that benefits both sellers and consumers. The text refutes claims that sellers are forced to use these services.
  4. Innovations in Amazon Prime: Amazon Prime is hailed as a success story, with ongoing innovations to enhance the customer experience. Prime’s rapid delivery options and the ability for sellers to offer Prime shipping on their own sites are cited as examples of value to consumers and sellers.
  5. The Dynamic Retail Landscape: Amazon asserts that it operates within a dynamic and competitive retail industry, where consumers have various options to shop for the best deals, both online and offline. The text suggests that the FTC’s characterization of the retail market is inaccurate.
  6. Amazon’s Intent to Contest the Lawsuit: Amazon strongly disagrees with the FTC’s allegations and plans to contest the lawsuit vigorously. The company reiterates its commitment to putting customers and sellers first while continuing to innovate.

You Might Also Like

EU Launches In-Depth Probe into Mars’ $35.9 Billion Acquisition of Kellanova

UK Antitrust Regulator Signals Potential Shift in Global Merger Oversight

Italy Fines Armani €3.5 mln for Misleading Social Responsibility Claims

UK FCA Considers Redress Scheme for Mis-Selling Motor Scandal

Brazil Recommends Blocking Fagron–Purifarma Merger

TAGGED:amazoncompetition lawftc

Weekly Newsletter

Insights you can turn into money or clients
Investors

Covestro’s 10% Drop: Merger Arbitrage Opportunity or Value Trap?

Editorial
Editorial
September 9, 2025
Zalando’s EU Court Loss Harmless; Real Threats Are Weak Demand, Shein and Temu
Antitrust Intelligence

About Us

We identify and quantify regulatory risks so you can take better decisions
Menu
  • Lawyers
  • Investors
  • News
  • My Bookmarks
  • About Us
  • Contact
Legals
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Subscribe Us

Subscribe to our newsletter to get weekly ideas to make money and get new clients!

© 2025 Antitrust Intelligence. All Rights Reserved. - Web design Málaga by Seb creativos
Antitrust Intelligence
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Antitrust & Financial Markets? Download Your Free Guide NOW
Five tips to find unique regulatory intelligence
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?