Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Prices
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • What it is?
  • Antitrust Club
    • What it is?
Reading: Italy’s Authority Imposes €936 Million Fine on Major Oil Companies for Price-Fixing Cartel
Font ResizerAa
Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Search
  • What it is?
  • Antitrust Club
    • What it is?
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
News

Italy’s Authority Imposes €936 Million Fine on Major Oil Companies for Price-Fixing Cartel

Editorial
Last updated: September 26, 2025 7:04 am
Editorial
Published September 26, 2025
Share
Photo by Dawn McDonald on Unsplash

The Italian Competition Authority (Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato – AGCM) has imposed fines totaling more than €936 million on some of the country’s leading oil companies, including Eni, Esso, IP, Q8, Saras and Tamoil, for participating in a cartel that restricted competition in the automotive fuel market.

The investigation, launched after a whistleblower report, revealed that the companies coordinated their pricing strategy by jointly determining the value of the “bio” component included in fuel prices. This component, introduced by the companies in order to comply with biofuel obligations under national law, increased in value from approximately €20 per cubic meter in 2019 to around €60 per cubic meter in 2023. The cartel was found to have begun on 1 January 2020 and to have lasted until 30 June 2023.

According to the Authority, the oil companies engaged in simultaneous and coordinated price increases, which were largely aligned and facilitated through direct and indirect exchanges of commercially sensitive information. The practice was further supported by the systematic publication of the bio component’s value in the specialized trade outlet Staffetta Quotidiana, often on the basis of information provided directly by Eni.

At the conclusion of its extensive proceedings, the AGCM imposed significant financial penalties: Eni was fined €336,214,660, Esso €129,363,561, IP €163,669,804, Q8 €172,592,363, Saras €43,788,944, and Tamoil €91,029,755. By contrast, Iplom and Repsol, which had also been investigated, were excluded from liability.

The decision highlights the determination of the Italian Competition Authority to pursue and sanction collusive practices in strategic sectors, particularly where they distort consumer prices and undermine compliance with environmental regulations.

You Might Also Like

BBVA–Sabadell Merger Approved with Strings Attached

Microsoft Races to Avoid EU Antitrust Showdown Over Cloud Practices

Microsoft’s Acquisition of Inflection AI: What the CMA Found and What It Means

Italy’s Competition Authority Investigates EV Automakers for Alleged Misleading Consumer Information

Nippon Steel’s U.S. Steel Takeover Faces New Hurdle

TAGGED:automotive fuel marketcartelEniEssoIPitalyoil companiesprice fixingQ8SarasTamoil

Weekly Newsletter

Insights you can turn into money or clients
Antitrust Intelligence

About Us

We identify and quantify regulatory risks so you can take better decisions
Menu
  • Insights
  • Financial Analysis
  • News
  • My Bookmarks
  • About Us
  • Contact
Legals
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Subscribe Us

Subscribe to our newsletter to get weekly ideas to make money and get new clients!

© 2025 Antitrust Intelligence. All Rights Reserved. - Web design Málaga by Seb creativos
Antitrust Intelligence
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Antitrust & Financial Markets? Download Your Free Guide NOW
Five tips to find unique regulatory intelligence
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?