Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Prices
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • What it is?
  • Antitrust Club
    • What it is?
Reading: Brewing Groups Face Antitrust Charges in Luxembourg
Font ResizerAa
Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Search
  • What it is?
  • Antitrust Club
    • What it is?
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
News

Brewing Groups Face Antitrust Charges in Luxembourg

Editorial
Last updated: September 16, 2025 7:59 am
Editorial
Published September 16, 2025
Share
Photo by Kratky Jaromir on Unsplash

The Luxembourg Competition Authority has issued a statement of objections to two groups active in the national brewing sector, accusing them of practices that could unlawfully restrict competition.

According to the Authority, the companies allegedly locked the market for beer production and supply to the out-of-home channel—covering hotels, cafés and restaurants—through the widespread use of single-brand contracts. These agreements, concluded with a large majority of drinking establishments across Luxembourg, reportedly required venues to source most of their beer from a single brewing group for several years.

Preliminary findings from the Authority’s investigating officer suggest that such contracts limit rival brewers’ ability to enter or expand in the market, reduce price competition, and curtail inter-brand rivalry within establishments. The Authority underlined, however, that these conclusions remain provisional and do not prejudge the outcome of the case.

The next stage will be the adversarial phase, in which the companies concerned may submit written observations and, if necessary, appear at a hearing before the Authority’s College. Only then will a final decision be taken on whether the alleged infringements are substantiated.

In line with its policy of respecting the presumption of innocence, the Authority has declined to disclose the identity of the companies targeted or the specific practices under investigation.

A statement of objections marks the transition from investigation to adversarial proceedings. Under Luxembourg law, once notified, the companies have at least one month to respond and may consult the case file. Hearings can be held no earlier than two months after notification. The Authority may also invite third parties able to demonstrate sufficient interest to provide input.

The Authority stressed that the investigating officer’s legal assessment is not binding on the College, which will ultimately decide whether anti-competitive practices have been proven.

This case arises under the competition law of 30 November 2022, which permits the Authority to release succinct public information about ongoing proceedings when justified by the public interest and provided the presumption of innocence is preserved.

You Might Also Like

EU Fines Car Manufacturers and ACEA €458 Million for Recycling Cartel

NCLAT Reduces CCI’s Fine on Google in Play Store Case by 75%

Epic Games Wins Partial Victory in Australian Antitrust Case Against Apple and Google

Ferrero Nears $3 Billion Deal to Acquire WK Kellogg, Expanding U.S. Food Empire

Sweden Targets Barriers to Grocery Store Entry

TAGGED:beerBrewing groupscompetitioncontractsLuxemburgsingle-brand

Weekly Newsletter

Insights you can turn into money or clients
Financial Analysis

Getty Stock Raises 10% In a Day, But October Will Be Bumpy

Editorial
Editorial
October 5, 2025
Which Cartellist is a “Buy” Opportunity?
Antitrust Intelligence

About Us

We identify and quantify regulatory risks so you can take better decisions
Menu
  • Insights
  • Financial Analysis
  • News
  • My Bookmarks
  • About Us
  • Contact
Legals
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Subscribe Us

Subscribe to our newsletter to get weekly ideas to make money and get new clients!

© 2025 Antitrust Intelligence. All Rights Reserved. - Web design Málaga by Seb creativos
Antitrust Intelligence
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Antitrust & Financial Markets? Download Your Free Guide NOW
Five tips to find unique regulatory intelligence
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?