Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Prices
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • What it is?
  • Antitrust Club
    • What it is?
Reading: Portuguese Regulator Accuses Beverage Companies of No-Poach Deal
Font ResizerAa
Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Search
  • What it is?
  • Antitrust Club
    • What it is?
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
News

Portuguese Regulator Accuses Beverage Companies of No-Poach Deal

Editorial
Last updated: September 10, 2025 2:44 pm
Editorial
Published September 10, 2025
Share
Photo by Dillon Wanner on Unsplash

Portugal’s competition watchdog has accused three beverage companies of colluding to keep workers from switching jobs, in what it says was a long-running “no-poach” scheme that may have harmed both employees and consumers.

Contents
Impact on Workers and ConsumersA Growing Focus

The Competition Authority (AdC) said the companies, along with the parent company of one of them, struck agreements between 2016 and 2023 not to hire or solicit each other’s staff. A formal charge, known as a Notice of Illicitness, was issued after investigators concluded there was a reasonable chance sanctions could follow.

The probe began in January this year, when one of the companies came forward under the AdC’s leniency program, which allows firms to avoid or reduce fines if they admit wrongdoing and provide evidence.

For now, the accused companies are still presumed innocent. They will have the opportunity to respond to the allegations and present their defense before the regulator makes a final decision.

Impact on Workers and Consumers

No-poach deals, where firms agree not to compete for each other’s employees, are illegal under Portuguese competition law. Regulators say such practices hurt workers by limiting their bargaining power, suppressing wages, and restricting career opportunities.

But the effects may also reach consumers. The AdC warned that limiting competition for talent can reduce innovation, lower quality, and even push up prices in the marketplace.

A Growing Focus

This is not the first time the Portuguese regulator has targeted labor-market collusion. In 2021, the AdC published a report and good practice guide highlighting the risks of no-poach agreements and has since imposed fines in several cases. Strengthening competition in labor markets, the watchdog says, remains one of its enforcement priorities.

“Practices like these don’t just affect companies,” the AdC said. “They impact citizens directly, both as workers and as consumers.”

You Might Also Like

Toyota Industries’ $31 Billion Buyout Stalls Amid Global Antitrust Reviews

India to Scrap Digital Ad Tax in Bid to Boost U.S. Trade Relations

Azul-Gol Merger: Transforming Brazil’s Skies

Senate’s Confirmation of Bedoya Paves the Way for Rulemaking at FTC

U.S. Justice Department Sues Apple Over Alleged Antitrust Violations

TAGGED:AdCbeverage companiesno-poachPortugal

Weekly Newsletter

Insights you can turn into money or clients
Financial Analysis

Getty Stock Raises 10% In a Day, But October Will Be Bumpy

Editorial
Editorial
October 5, 2025
Which Cartellist is a “Buy” Opportunity?
Antitrust Intelligence

About Us

We identify and quantify regulatory risks so you can take better decisions
Menu
  • Insights
  • Financial Analysis
  • News
  • My Bookmarks
  • About Us
  • Contact
Legals
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Subscribe Us

Subscribe to our newsletter to get weekly ideas to make money and get new clients!

© 2025 Antitrust Intelligence. All Rights Reserved. - Web design Málaga by Seb creativos
Antitrust Intelligence
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Antitrust & Financial Markets? Download Your Free Guide NOW
Five tips to find unique regulatory intelligence
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?