Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Prices
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • What We Offer
Reading: UK Finds Cloud Market Failing Competition Test, Targets Microsoft and AWS
Font ResizerAa
Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Search
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • What We Offer
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
News

UK Finds Cloud Market Failing Competition Test, Targets Microsoft and AWS

Editorial
Last updated: July 31, 2025 11:36 am
Editorial
Published July 31, 2025
Share

The UK’s Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has concluded that competition in the cloud services sector is “not working well,” warning that market concentration, barriers to switching, and Microsoft’s licensing practices are restricting customer choice and driving up costs.

Contents
Barriers to Switching and Multi-Cloud UseMicrosoft’s Licensing Under ScrutinyAI’s Growing RoleRecommendations for Strategic Market Status

In a final decision published on Thursday, the CMA said its investigation found that Microsoft and Amazon Web Services (AWS) hold entrenched market power in public cloud infrastructure services (IaaS) and platform services (PaaS), commanding significant market shares and earning sustained returns well above their cost of capital. Together, the two firms accounted for more than 60% of the UK market in 2024, with Google trailing at less than 10%.

The watchdog found that customers spent £10.5 billion on cloud services last year, with demand growing nearly 30% annually since 2020. But despite strong growth and innovation in the sector, the CMA said outcomes for customers remain suboptimal. “A more competitive market would deliver consistently lower prices, higher quality, and faster innovation,” the authority said.

Barriers to Switching and Multi-Cloud Use

The CMA noted that fewer than 1% of UK customers switch providers each year, while multi-cloud adoption remains rare among small and medium-sized enterprises. High egress fees for data transfers, technical incompatibilities between platforms, and complex contract structures have deterred customers from moving workloads.

“These barriers lock customers into their initial choice of provider,” the report found, adding that they reduce incentives for suppliers to compete aggressively for rivals’ customers.

Microsoft’s Licensing Under Scrutiny

A central focus of the investigation was Microsoft’s software licensing practices. The CMA concluded that Microsoft has leveraged its dominance in software such as Windows Server, SQL Server, and Office productivity suites to tilt competition in favor of its Azure platform.

In some cases, the authority found, AWS and Google face higher licensing costs than Microsoft’s own customers, making their offerings less attractive. In addition, certain Microsoft products are not available for use on rival clouds or cannot be transferred under existing licenses.

“These practices are reducing competition by disadvantaging AWS and Google in competing for customers reliant on Microsoft software,” the CMA said, warning that this has led to weaker constraints on Microsoft’s pricing and service quality.

AI’s Growing Role

The report acknowledged that artificial intelligence services are reshaping cloud demand, with Microsoft, AWS, and Google all investing heavily in accelerated compute and AI partnerships. However, the CMA said AI capabilities have yet to materially alter competitive dynamics, though their impact is expected to grow.

Recommendations for Strategic Market Status

To remedy the harms identified, the CMA recommended that its board use new digital markets powers under the DMCC Act to launch Strategic Market Status (SMS) investigations into Microsoft and AWS. Such a designation would allow the authority to impose targeted interventions, including conduct requirements designed to curb anti-competitive practices.

“The measures would directly benefit UK customers while improving competitive conditions for other providers,” the CMA said. It added that the flexible design of the new regime would allow interventions to adapt to market developments and align with similar regulatory efforts in Europe.

The CMA board is expected to consider the next phase of investigations in early 2026. In the meantime, the authority urged continued monitoring of cloud procurement, particularly in the public sector, and close scrutiny of cloud providers’ conduct.

You Might Also Like

BCA Opens Investigation into Proximus–Orange Fiber Cooperation

InPost Buys Yodel, Becomes UK’s #3 Logistics Player

Sports Direct Settles Antitrust Dispute Over Newcastle United Replica Kit

Apple Faces Potential Antitrust Fine in France Over Privacy Tool

European Parliament Calls on Commission to Scrutinise Visa, Mastercard, Amazon and Microsoft

TAGGED:awscmamicrosoftuk

Weekly Newsletter

Insights you can turn into money or clients
Investors

Microsoft, Google & Amazon Soar in the Cloud While Watchdogs Hit Snooze

Editorial
Editorial
August 3, 2025
Telefónica’s M&A Ambitions Meet Reality Check After Q2 Results
Antitrust Intelligence

About Us

We identify and quantify regulatory risks so you can take better decisions
Menu
  • Lawyers
  • Investors
  • News
  • My Bookmarks
  • About Us
  • Contact
Legals
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Subscribe Us

Subscribe to our newsletter to get weekly ideas to make money and get new clients!

© 2025 Antitrust Intelligence. All Rights Reserved. - Web design Málaga by Seb creativos
Antitrust Intelligence
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Antitrust & Financial Markets? Download Your Free Guide NOW
Five tips to find unique regulatory intelligence
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?