Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Prices
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • What it is?
  • Antitrust Club
    • What it is?
Reading: Opera Files Antitrust Complaint Against Microsoft in Brazil Over Edge Browser
Font ResizerAa
Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Search
  • What it is?
  • Antitrust Club
    • What it is?
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
News

Opera Files Antitrust Complaint Against Microsoft in Brazil Over Edge Browser

Editorial
Last updated: July 30, 2025 7:39 am
Editorial
Published July 30, 2025
Share
https://press.opera.com/2025/07/30/opera-files-competition-complaint-against-microsoft-in-brazil/

Norwegian software company Opera (NASDAQ: OPRA) has lodged a formal complaint with Brazil’s antitrust authority CADE, accusing Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT) of unfairly favoring its Edge browser on Windows PCs and undermining consumer choice.

Opera, developer of the Opera and Opera GX browsers, alleged that Microsoft uses its dominance in the operating system and productivity software markets to restrict competition. The complaint claims that Edge is pre-installed and set as the default on Windows devices while rival browsers are excluded from similar opportunities.

“Microsoft thwarts browser competition on Windows at every turn,” said Aaron McParlan, Opera’s General Counsel. “If a person in Brazil wants to use a browser other than Edge on their Windows machine, they should be allowed to freely do so — without being actively obstructed or discouraged.”

According to Opera, Microsoft’s practices include offering incentives to PC manufacturers to pre-install Edge exclusively, displaying on-screen messages that dissuade users from downloading competing browsers, and overriding user choices in key functions such as opening PDFs, emails, and searches. Opera also criticized the use of “dark patterns” — manipulative design tactics that steer users back to Edge.

Opera, which had 6.8% of Brazil’s desktop browser market in June compared with Edge’s 11.5% and Google Chrome’s dominant 75% (StatCounter), said the case reflects a global effort to ensure fair browser competition. The company has also challenged Microsoft’s practices in Europe, including a case before EU courts seeking Edge’s designation as a gatekeeper service under the Digital Markets Act.

Opera has asked CADE to investigate and impose remedies, such as requiring a neutral browser choice screen for Windows users in Brazil and allowing PC manufacturers to pre-install rival browsers as defaults.

“Brazilians are very engaged and enthusiastic users of consumer tech products and they deserve fair access to the browser that best suits their needs,” McParlan said. “Microsoft’s tactics stifle both competition and innovation.”

Microsoft did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

You Might Also Like

U.K. Ministers Scrap Plan to Empower Tech Regulator

Maersk Drilling-Noble Corp Offer Remedies to U.K.’s CMA

Prada Receives EU Approval for Acquisition of Versace

NVIDIA Could Profit From Microsoft-Activision’s Approval

Korea’s Competition Watchdog Launches Market Survey On the Data Sector

TAGGED:antitrustBrazilBrowserCAADEEdgemicrosoftOpera

Weekly Newsletter

Insights you can turn into money or clients
Financial Analysis

Getty Stock Raises 10% In a Day, But October Will Be Bumpy

Editorial
Editorial
October 5, 2025
Which Cartellist is a “Buy” Opportunity?
Antitrust Intelligence

About Us

We identify and quantify regulatory risks so you can take better decisions
Menu
  • Insights
  • Financial Analysis
  • News
  • My Bookmarks
  • About Us
  • Contact
Legals
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Subscribe Us

Subscribe to our newsletter to get weekly ideas to make money and get new clients!

© 2025 Antitrust Intelligence. All Rights Reserved. - Web design Málaga by Seb creativos
Antitrust Intelligence
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Antitrust & Financial Markets? Download Your Free Guide NOW
Five tips to find unique regulatory intelligence
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?