Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Prices
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • Antitrust Intelligence
  • Antitrust Club
  • Antitrust Investor
Reading: Brazil Recommends Structural Remedies for Bimbo’s Acquisition of Wickbold
Font ResizerAa
Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Search
  • Antitrust Intelligence
  • Antitrust Club
  • Antitrust Investor
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
bread
News

Brazil Recommends Structural Remedies for Bimbo’s Acquisition of Wickbold

Editorial
Last updated: June 11, 2025 9:03 pm
Editorial
Published May 28, 2025
Share
Image by Sofia Terzoni from Pixabay

Brazil’s competition authority, the Administrative Council for Economic Defense (Cade), has raised concerns over Grupo Bimbo’s proposed acquisition of Wickbold’s bakery business in Brazil. In a decision issued on Tuesday (May 27), Cade’s General Superintendence (SG) recommended structural remedies as a condition for approving the deal and referred the case to the agency’s Administrative Tribunal for further review.

The transaction, announced in August 2024, involves Bimbo do Brasil Ltda., a subsidiary of Mexican multinational Grupo Bimbo, acquiring the industrial baking operations of the Wickbold Group, including its well-known brands Wickbold®, Seven Boys®, and Tá Pronto®. The acquisition also encompasses four manufacturing facilities in Brazil’s southern region and more than 2,500 employees.

Both companies are leading players in Brazil’s industrial bakery sector. Bimbo markets products such as sliced bread, cakes, snacks, and rolls under brands like Pullman, Plusvita, Ana Maria, Rap10 Bisnaguito, and Crocantíssimo. Wickbold’s portfolio includes ready-to-eat breads, panettones, cookies, and sweet baked goods, catering to both retail and food service segments across the country.

Following a detailed competition assessment, SG/Cade identified horizontal overlaps in the national markets for packaged cakes, mini cakes, and industrialized bread sold through food service channels. Additional overlaps were found in specific segments of the retail bread market, which were analyzed at both national and regional levels. Cade noted that Brazil’s regional markets have distinct competitive dynamics, with variations in the ability of local players to respond to price shifts or increased demand.

The analysis pointed out that not all bread products are substitutable, either from a supply or demand perspective. Market testing revealed that consumer behavior varies significantly across categories—some consumers are driven primarily by price, while others show strong brand loyalty or place high value on tradition and manufacturer reputation. In certain segments, consumers appeared more willing to absorb price increases due to the lack of equivalent alternatives.

SG/Cade flagged particular concerns in the multigrain sliced bread and tortilla/wrap bread segments, both nationally and in several regional markets. Other product categories also showed potential competition risks in localized areas. The agency concluded that the deal could result in significant market concentration and reduced competitive pressure in these segments.

As a result, the General Superintendence recommended the imposition of structural remedies to address these concerns. While specific remedies were not disclosed in the dispatch, such measures often include divestitures of assets, brands, or production facilities to preserve competition.

The case now moves to Cade’s Administrative Tribunal, where it will be assigned to a reporting commissioner responsible for guiding the analysis and presenting it to the full board for judgment. Cade has a legal deadline of 240 days to issue a final decision on the merger, extendable by an additional 90 days.

Grupo Bimbo, the world’s largest bakery company with operations in over 35 countries, described the acquisition as a strategic move to strengthen its presence in southern Brazil. “This family-owned business complements our brand portfolio with brands that consumers love,” said Grupo Bimbo CEO Rafael Pamias at the time of the announcement.

The outcome of Cade’s review will determine whether Grupo Bimbo can proceed with integrating one of Brazil’s most iconic baking businesses into its global portfolio.

You Might Also Like

Meta Restricts Data Usage to Address UK Concerns

BBVA–Sabadell Merger Approved with Strings Attached

Sweden Reviews Contractual Terms Between Food Platforms and Restaurants

EU Court Sides with Qualcomm in $1Bn Antitrust Fine

MEPs Push for EU Competitiveness Reforms in Banking and Competition Policy

TAGGED:acquisitionbakeryBrazilCADEGrupo BimboSGWickbold

Weekly Newsletter

Insights you can turn into money or clients
Antitrust Intelligence

About Us

We identify and quantify regulatory risks so you can take better decisions
Menu
  • Insights
  • Financial Analysis
  • News
  • My Bookmarks
  • About Us
  • Contact
Legals
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Subscribe Us

Subscribe to our newsletter to get weekly ideas to make money and get new clients!

© 2025 Antitrust Intelligence. All Rights Reserved. - Web design Málaga by Seb creativos
Antitrust Intelligence
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Antitrust & Financial Markets? Download Your Free Guide NOW
Five tips to find unique regulatory intelligence
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?