Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Prices
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • What We Offer
Reading: Capital One’s $35 Billion Acquisition of Discover Clears DOJ Hurdle
Font ResizerAa
Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Search
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • What We Offer
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
News

Capital One’s $35 Billion Acquisition of Discover Clears DOJ Hurdle

Editorial
Last updated: June 11, 2025 9:05 pm
Editorial
Published April 4, 2025
Share
Photo by cottonbro studio: https://www.pexels.com/photo/one-dollar-bill-3943728/

Capital One Financial Corp.’s proposed $35 billion acquisition of Discover Financial Services has received a significant boost, with the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) reportedly concluding its antitrust review without raising objections.

According to The New York Times, the DOJ has informed relevant regulatory bodies that it does not see sufficient competition concerns to warrant blocking the deal.

The DOJ conveyed its findings to both the Federal Reserve and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), which are also reviewing the merger. Citing individuals familiar with the matter, the report states that the DOJ submitted a letter formally concluding its investigation and affirming that the merger does not pose competitive threats under federal antitrust laws.

A spokesperson for Capital One commented to Reuters, stating, “Our deal with Discover Financial complies with the Bank Merger Act’s legal requirements and we remain well-positioned to gain approval,” though the company declined to elaborate on the DOJ’s decision.

Announced in February 2024, the merger would position Capital One as the largest U.S. credit card issuer by outstanding balances and the sixth-largest bank by assets. It would also give the company control of Discover’s proprietary payment network, elevating Capital One’s position within the highly competitive payment services sector. Discover operates one of the four major U.S. card payment networks, alongside Visa, Mastercard, and American Express.

While the DOJ’s clearance marks a critical milestone, the deal remains under further scrutiny. Both the Federal Reserve and the OCC will continue their evaluations, incorporating input from the DOJ. Additionally, state-level antitrust reviews are ongoing, particularly in New York and California.

A spokesperson for California Attorney General Rob Bonta expressed concern about the merger’s potential effects on financially vulnerable consumers. “We are concerned that the Capital One/Discover merger could most affect those consumers who can afford it the least. No one is above the law and we’re taking a close look at this proposed merger,” the spokesperson said.

A recent letter, written by Elizabeth Warren (United States Senator), addressed to Fed Chair Jerome Powell, Vice Chair Michael Barr, and Acting Comptroller Michael Hsu accuses the agencies of failing to fulfill the directives of President Biden’s 2021 Executive Order on Promoting Competition. That order called for a strengthened framework for evaluating bank mergers, urging agencies to modernize outdated policies.

The letter highlights that the DOJ has already acted on its own by withdrawing from the 1995 Bank Merger Guidelines and adopting the more robust 2023 Merger Guidelines, supplemented by a 2024 Banking Addendum. The FDIC followed suit, finalizing an updated policy in September 2024 that prioritizes competitive effects, financial stability, and community impact. However, the Fed and OCC have yet to adopt similarly rigorous standards, prompting criticism from lawmakers and advocacy groups.

“Using a set of weak, decades-old rules to evaluate the massive Capital One–Discover deal… would amount to regulatory malfeasance,” the letter states, urging the Fed and OCC to adopt the DOJ and FDIC’s modern frameworks in reviewing the deal.

Critics argue that failure to modernize merger review procedures risks accelerating consolidation in the banking sector, potentially harming low-income consumers and diminishing competition. As federal and state reviews continue, the outcome of the Capital One–Discover merger may hinge not only on the specifics of the transaction but also on broader questions about the future of antitrust enforcement in the financial sector.

The Department of Justice declined to comment publicly on the matter, and Discover Financial did not respond to a request for comment.

You Might Also Like

Amazon Responds to the FTC lawsuit

OpenAI Open to Buying Chrome if Google Is Forced to Sell, Exec Says

Nippon Steel’s U.S. Steel Takeover Faces New Hurdle

Brussels Pressures Italy to Lift Golden Power Hurdles on UniCredit Deal

IOC’s Ticketing Policies Face EU Antitrust Challenge from German Marketplace

TAGGED:Capital OneDiscover Financial ServicesDOJFederal Reserve and the OfficefinancemergerOCC

Weekly Newsletter

Insights you can turn into money or clients
telefonica
Investors

Telefónica’s M&A Ambitions Meet Reality Check After Q2 Results

Editorial
Editorial
August 6, 2025
Microsoft, Google & Amazon Soar in the Cloud While Watchdogs Hit Snooze
Antitrust Intelligence

About Us

We identify and quantify regulatory risks so you can take better decisions
Menu
  • Lawyers
  • Investors
  • News
  • My Bookmarks
  • About Us
  • Contact
Legals
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Subscribe Us

Subscribe to our newsletter to get weekly ideas to make money and get new clients!

© 2025 Antitrust Intelligence. All Rights Reserved. - Web design Málaga by Seb creativos
Antitrust Intelligence
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Antitrust & Financial Markets? Download Your Free Guide NOW
Five tips to find unique regulatory intelligence
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?