Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Prices
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • Antitrust Intelligence
  • Antitrust Club
  • Antitrust Investor
Reading: German Regulator Charges Apple with Abuse of Power Over App Tracking Tool
Font ResizerAa
Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Search
  • Antitrust Intelligence
  • Antitrust Club
  • Antitrust Investor
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
News

German Regulator Charges Apple with Abuse of Power Over App Tracking Tool

Editorial
Last updated: March 10, 2025 9:45 am
Editorial
Published February 18, 2025
Share

The German antitrust authority has formally charged Apple (AAPL.O) with abusing its market power through its App Tracking Transparency feature, accusing the tech giant of unfairly favoring its own services over competitors, Reuters reported.

The move could result in daily fines if Apple fails to amend its business practices.

The Federal Cartel Office (Bundeskartellamt) has been investigating Apple’s App Tracking Transparency Framework (ATTF) since its introduction in April 2021. The feature requires third-party apps to obtain explicit user consent before tracking them for advertising purposes. While Apple argues the ATTF enhances user privacy, critics—including Meta Platforms (META.O), app developers, and advertisers—argue that it disadvantages competing businesses by restricting their access to essential advertising data.

Allegations of Anti-Competitive Practices

Andreas Mundt, President of the Bundeskartellamt, stated that Apple’s approach creates significant hurdles for competing app publishers, limiting their ability to utilize user data for advertising. Meanwhile, Apple continues to leverage its ecosystem—including the App Store, Apple ID, and connected devices—to collect and utilize user data for its own advertising services, seemingly without the same stringent restrictions imposed on third-party apps.

“The ATTF makes it far more difficult for competing app publishers to access the user data relevant for advertising,” Mundt said. “The question at hand is whether Apple is allowed to apply stricter criteria to other providers than to itself when it comes to requesting such user consent. Doing so may amount to unequal treatment and self-preferencing, which are prohibited under competition law.”

The case was triggered by complaints from industry associations representing publishers, broadcasters, advertisers, and technology firms. Thomas Höppner, a partner at the law firm Hausfeld representing the complainants, described the charges as “groundbreaking,” accusing Apple of creating an artificial opacity in its ecosystem that stifles competition, raises costs for app developers, and ultimately benefits Apple’s revenue streams.

Apple’s Defense and Possible Repercussions

Apple defended its policy in an emailed statement to Reuters, asserting that it adheres to higher privacy standards than it requires from third-party developers. “We … will continue to constructively engage with the Federal Cartel Office to ensure users continue to have transparency and control over their data,” Apple stated.

Under Germany’s competition law (Section 19a(2) of the German Competition Act, GWB) and the EU’s Article 102 TFEU, the Bundeskartellamt has raised concerns over three key aspects of Apple’s ATTF framework:

  1. Definition of Tracking – Apple defines tracking narrowly, only applying stringent restrictions to cross-company data sharing while excluding its own ecosystem’s internal data collection practices.
  2. Consent Dialogues – Third-party apps must present up to four consecutive consent dialogues, whereas Apple’s services require fewer steps, making it easier for users to consent to Apple’s data use.
  3. Interface Design – Apple’s consent dialogues appear designed to encourage users to allow data processing by Apple, while discouraging similar permissions for third-party apps.

If found guilty of breaching Germany’s antitrust rules, Apple could face fines amounting to 10% of its annual turnover. The company has been given an opportunity to respond to the allegations before a final ruling, which could come as early as this year, though it is more likely in 2025.

Broader Implications and EU Collaboration

The case against Apple is part of a broader regulatory push across Europe to ensure fair competition in digital markets. In April 2023, the Bundeskartellamt determined that Apple holds “paramount significance for competition across markets,” subjecting it to heightened scrutiny under Germany’s extended abuse control framework. Apple has appealed this classification, with the case pending before Germany’s Federal Court of Justice.

The Bundeskartellamt is closely coordinating its investigation with the European Commission and other national competition authorities examining the ATTF’s compliance with competition laws. The outcome of these proceedings will have significant implications not only for Apple but also for the broader digital advertising industry, particularly for companies relying on targeted ads to fund free app services.

The Federal Court of Justice is set to deliver its ruling on Apple’s appeal on March 18, 2025, which may shape the regulator’s final decision regarding penalties and enforcement actions against the tech giant.

You Might Also Like

Brazil’s CADE Opens Probe Into Anglo American’s $500 Million Nickel Sale

Where are the cartel investigations?

Musk Faces FTC Antitrust Review on Twitter Purchase and 9% Stake

Spain Probes UEFA Over Super League Block

U.S. Judge Rules Google Illegally Monopolized Digital Ad Tech Market

TAGGED:anti-competitive practicesantitrust authorityappappleATTFBundeskartellamtgermanyThe Federal Cartel Office

Weekly Newsletter

Insights you can turn into money or clients
Antitrust Intelligence

About Us

We identify and quantify regulatory risks so you can take better decisions
Menu
  • Insights
  • Financial Analysis
  • News
  • My Bookmarks
  • About Us
  • Contact
Legals
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Subscribe Us

Subscribe to our newsletter to get weekly ideas to make money and get new clients!

© 2025 Antitrust Intelligence. All Rights Reserved. - Web design Málaga by Seb creativos
Antitrust Intelligence
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Antitrust & Financial Markets? Download Your Free Guide NOW
Five tips to find unique regulatory intelligence
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?