Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Sign in
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • For Lawyers
    For Lawyers
    Here, you’ll find the regulatory trends and hidden market shifts that others miss. You’ll learn where markets (and your clients’ industries) are heading—and how to…
    Show More
    Latest News
    Apple, Meta Refusal to Comply with EU rules May Bring New Fines, But Profits Too
    July 20, 2025
    Getty Images + Shutterstock: A Deal That Puts UK Regulator to the Test
    July 16, 2025
    Meta Bets Big on Smart Glasses, But Money is on Ads, Not Hardware
    July 15, 2025
    OpenAI–Google AI Browser War Exposes Limits of EU Tech Rules
    July 14, 2025
  • For Investors
    For Investors
    Regulatory events move markets—often faster than earnings reports. A merger approval or a hefty fine can send a stock soaring or sinking in a day.…
    Show More
    Latest News
    New EU rules targeting Shein and Temu Likely to Benefit Zalando
    July 18, 2025
    Symrise: How to benefit from a Cartel Investigation
    July 16, 2025
    Bank Pekao: On Its Way to lead Poland’s financial sector
    July 14, 2025
    Nexi: Solid Numbers With Regulatory Events as Catalysts
    July 14, 2025
  • News
    News
    Stay informed with our global antitrust news compilation—bringing you the latest developments, regulatory updates, and key cases from around the world, all in one place
    Show More
    Latest News
    Zuckerberg, Meta Executives Settle $8 Billion Privacy Lawsuit
    July 18, 2025
    Turkish Authority Opens Antitrust Probe into Mastercard and Visa
    July 18, 2025
    Malaysia Fines Three Contractors for Bid Rigging
    July 17, 2025
    EU to Launch Antitrust Probe into Universal’s Downtown Music Deal
    July 17, 2025
  • Why Join?
  • Memberships
Reading: German Regulator Charges Apple with Abuse of Power Over App Tracking Tool
Font ResizerAa
Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Search
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • Why Join?
  • Memberships
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
News

German Regulator Charges Apple with Abuse of Power Over App Tracking Tool

Editorial
Last updated: March 10, 2025 9:45 am
Editorial
Published February 18, 2025
Share

The German antitrust authority has formally charged Apple (AAPL.O) with abusing its market power through its App Tracking Transparency feature, accusing the tech giant of unfairly favoring its own services over competitors, Reuters reported.

The move could result in daily fines if Apple fails to amend its business practices.

The Federal Cartel Office (Bundeskartellamt) has been investigating Apple’s App Tracking Transparency Framework (ATTF) since its introduction in April 2021. The feature requires third-party apps to obtain explicit user consent before tracking them for advertising purposes. While Apple argues the ATTF enhances user privacy, critics—including Meta Platforms (META.O), app developers, and advertisers—argue that it disadvantages competing businesses by restricting their access to essential advertising data.

Allegations of Anti-Competitive Practices

Andreas Mundt, President of the Bundeskartellamt, stated that Apple’s approach creates significant hurdles for competing app publishers, limiting their ability to utilize user data for advertising. Meanwhile, Apple continues to leverage its ecosystem—including the App Store, Apple ID, and connected devices—to collect and utilize user data for its own advertising services, seemingly without the same stringent restrictions imposed on third-party apps.

“The ATTF makes it far more difficult for competing app publishers to access the user data relevant for advertising,” Mundt said. “The question at hand is whether Apple is allowed to apply stricter criteria to other providers than to itself when it comes to requesting such user consent. Doing so may amount to unequal treatment and self-preferencing, which are prohibited under competition law.”

The case was triggered by complaints from industry associations representing publishers, broadcasters, advertisers, and technology firms. Thomas Höppner, a partner at the law firm Hausfeld representing the complainants, described the charges as “groundbreaking,” accusing Apple of creating an artificial opacity in its ecosystem that stifles competition, raises costs for app developers, and ultimately benefits Apple’s revenue streams.

Apple’s Defense and Possible Repercussions

Apple defended its policy in an emailed statement to Reuters, asserting that it adheres to higher privacy standards than it requires from third-party developers. “We … will continue to constructively engage with the Federal Cartel Office to ensure users continue to have transparency and control over their data,” Apple stated.

Under Germany’s competition law (Section 19a(2) of the German Competition Act, GWB) and the EU’s Article 102 TFEU, the Bundeskartellamt has raised concerns over three key aspects of Apple’s ATTF framework:

  1. Definition of Tracking – Apple defines tracking narrowly, only applying stringent restrictions to cross-company data sharing while excluding its own ecosystem’s internal data collection practices.
  2. Consent Dialogues – Third-party apps must present up to four consecutive consent dialogues, whereas Apple’s services require fewer steps, making it easier for users to consent to Apple’s data use.
  3. Interface Design – Apple’s consent dialogues appear designed to encourage users to allow data processing by Apple, while discouraging similar permissions for third-party apps.

If found guilty of breaching Germany’s antitrust rules, Apple could face fines amounting to 10% of its annual turnover. The company has been given an opportunity to respond to the allegations before a final ruling, which could come as early as this year, though it is more likely in 2025.

Broader Implications and EU Collaboration

The case against Apple is part of a broader regulatory push across Europe to ensure fair competition in digital markets. In April 2023, the Bundeskartellamt determined that Apple holds “paramount significance for competition across markets,” subjecting it to heightened scrutiny under Germany’s extended abuse control framework. Apple has appealed this classification, with the case pending before Germany’s Federal Court of Justice.

The Bundeskartellamt is closely coordinating its investigation with the European Commission and other national competition authorities examining the ATTF’s compliance with competition laws. The outcome of these proceedings will have significant implications not only for Apple but also for the broader digital advertising industry, particularly for companies relying on targeted ads to fund free app services.

The Federal Court of Justice is set to deliver its ruling on Apple’s appeal on March 18, 2025, which may shape the regulator’s final decision regarding penalties and enforcement actions against the tech giant.

You Might Also Like

Portuguese Brisa Plans Full Acquisition of Via Verde

Worldline, Nexi Continue PayTech M&A Spree.

Banco Sabadell’s CEO Says BBVA’s acquisition will derail

CK Hutchison’s Port Deal Could Face Antitrust Reviews Across 23 Jurisdictions

$3.9 Billion Deal: DoorDash to Acquire Deliveroo

TAGGED:anti-competitive practicesantitrust authorityappappleATTFBundeskartellamtgermanyThe Federal Cartel Office

Weekly Newsletter

Insights you can turn into money or clients
Investors

New EU rules targeting Shein and Temu Likely to Benefit Zalando

Editorial
Editorial
July 18, 2025
Symrise: How to benefit from a Cartel Investigation
Antitrust Intelligence

About Us

We identify and quantify regulatory risks so you can take better decisions
Menu
  • Lawyers
  • Investors
  • News
  • My Bookmarks
  • About Us
  • Contact
Legals
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Subscribe Us

Subscribe to our newsletter to get weekly ideas to make money and get new clients!

© 2025 Antitrust Intelligence. All Rights Reserved. - Web design Málaga by Seb creativos
Antitrust Intelligence
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Antitrust & Financial Markets? Download Your Free Guide NOW
Five tips to find unique regulatory intelligence
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?