Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Sign in
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • For Lawyers
    For Lawyers
    Here, you’ll find the regulatory trends and hidden market shifts that others miss. You’ll learn where markets (and your clients’ industries) are heading—and how to…
    Show More
    Latest News
    Apple, Meta Refusal to Comply with EU rules May Bring New Fines, But Profits Too
    July 20, 2025
    Getty Images + Shutterstock: A Deal That Puts UK Regulator to the Test
    July 16, 2025
    Meta Bets Big on Smart Glasses, But Money is on Ads, Not Hardware
    July 15, 2025
    OpenAI–Google AI Browser War Exposes Limits of EU Tech Rules
    July 14, 2025
  • For Investors
    For Investors
    Regulatory events move markets—often faster than earnings reports. A merger approval or a hefty fine can send a stock soaring or sinking in a day.…
    Show More
    Latest News
    New EU rules targeting Shein and Temu Likely to Benefit Zalando
    July 18, 2025
    Symrise: How to benefit from a Cartel Investigation
    July 16, 2025
    Bank Pekao: On Its Way to lead Poland’s financial sector
    July 14, 2025
    Nexi: Solid Numbers With Regulatory Events as Catalysts
    July 14, 2025
  • News
    News
    Stay informed with our global antitrust news compilation—bringing you the latest developments, regulatory updates, and key cases from around the world, all in one place
    Show More
    Latest News
    EU Launches Legal Action Against Spain Over Bank Merger Rules
    July 21, 2025
    Zuckerberg, Meta Executives Settle $8 Billion Privacy Lawsuit
    July 18, 2025
    Turkish Authority Opens Antitrust Probe into Mastercard and Visa
    July 18, 2025
    Malaysia Fines Three Contractors for Bid Rigging
    July 17, 2025
  • Why Join?
  • Memberships
Reading: EU Antitrust Chief Margrethe Vestager Warns Against Apple and Meta Fees, Citing Concerns for Digital Markets Act Compliance
Font ResizerAa
Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Search
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • Why Join?
  • Memberships
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
News

EU Antitrust Chief Margrethe Vestager Warns Against Apple and Meta Fees, Citing Concerns for Digital Markets Act Compliance

Editorial
Last updated: March 10, 2025 9:45 am
Editorial
Published March 20, 2024
Share

In a recent development within the tech industry, Margrethe Vestager, the European Union’s antitrust chief, has raised concerns regarding the fee structures implemented by tech giants Apple and Meta Platforms (formerly Facebook).

Photo by Timothy Hales Bennett on Unsplash

Vestager’s warnings highlight potential obstacles these fees may pose to the objectives of the Digital Markets Act (DMA), aimed at fostering competition and consumer choice within the digital sphere.

Apple’s introduction of new fees, as part of its compliance efforts with the DMA, has drawn scrutiny from Vestager and industry observers alike. Among these fees is a core technology fee of 0.50 euro per user account per year, applicable even to major app developers not utilizing Apple’s payment services. This move has sparked criticism, particularly from rivals such as Epic Games, who perceive it as anticompetitive. Vestager, in an interview with Reuters, expressed her reservations about how these fees might deter users from accessing the benefits envisioned by the DMA.

Furthermore, Vestager highlighted Meta’s fee adjustments, emphasizing the need for continued dialogue to ensure compliance with the DMA. Despite Meta’s offer to reduce its monthly subscription fee for platforms like Facebook and Instagram, concerns persist regarding the underlying monetization methods and their alignment with DMA principles. Vestager’s remarks underscore the importance of assessing the broader implications of fee structures on market competition and user choice.

Beyond fee structures, Vestager cautioned against disparaging rival products as a means of deterring user migration, signaling potential regulatory action against such practices. Notably, Apple’s assertions regarding security risks associated with alternative services were deemed by Vestager as potentially misleading and unrelated to DMA compliance. Such statements, if perceived as anticompetitive tactics, could prompt regulatory intervention under the DMA framework.

In her approach to enforcing the DMA, Vestager emphasizes the significance of feedback from developers and stakeholders. The engagement of third parties plays a crucial role in informing potential investigations into companies subject to DMA regulations. Vestager’s acknowledgment of substantial feedback underscores the active dialogue surrounding digital market dynamics and regulatory enforcement.

You Might Also Like

Italy Fines Tour Operators €20M Over Colosseum Ticket Practices

South African Competition Commission Settles Nine-Year Edible Oils Dispute

EU Antitrust Chief: Trump Administration Has Strained US-EU Relations

UK Court Blocks Motorola’s Appeal, Upholds Price Cap

Capital One’s $35 Billion Acquisition of Discover Clears DOJ Hurdle

TAGGED:applebig techdigital markets actEU antitrust regulatorsEU ComissionfacebookmetaTech

Weekly Newsletter

Insights you can turn into money or clients
Investors

New EU rules targeting Shein and Temu Likely to Benefit Zalando

Editorial
Editorial
July 18, 2025
Symrise: How to benefit from a Cartel Investigation
Antitrust Intelligence

About Us

We identify and quantify regulatory risks so you can take better decisions
Menu
  • Lawyers
  • Investors
  • News
  • My Bookmarks
  • About Us
  • Contact
Legals
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Subscribe Us

Subscribe to our newsletter to get weekly ideas to make money and get new clients!

© 2025 Antitrust Intelligence. All Rights Reserved. - Web design Málaga by Seb creativos
Antitrust Intelligence
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Antitrust & Financial Markets? Download Your Free Guide NOW
Five tips to find unique regulatory intelligence
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?