Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Sign in
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • For Lawyers
    For Lawyers
    Here, you’ll find the regulatory trends and hidden market shifts that others miss. You’ll learn where markets (and your clients’ industries) are heading—and how to…
    Show More
    Latest News
    Apple, Meta Refusal to Comply with EU rules May Bring New Fines, But Profits Too
    July 20, 2025
    Getty Images + Shutterstock: A Deal That Puts UK Regulator to the Test
    July 16, 2025
    Meta Bets Big on Smart Glasses, But Money is on Ads, Not Hardware
    July 15, 2025
    OpenAI–Google AI Browser War Exposes Limits of EU Tech Rules
    July 14, 2025
  • For Investors
    For Investors
    Regulatory events move markets—often faster than earnings reports. A merger approval or a hefty fine can send a stock soaring or sinking in a day.…
    Show More
    Latest News
    New EU rules targeting Shein and Temu Likely to Benefit Zalando
    July 18, 2025
    Symrise: How to benefit from a Cartel Investigation
    July 16, 2025
    Bank Pekao: On Its Way to lead Poland’s financial sector
    July 14, 2025
    Nexi: Solid Numbers With Regulatory Events as Catalysts
    July 14, 2025
  • News
    News
    Stay informed with our global antitrust news compilation—bringing you the latest developments, regulatory updates, and key cases from around the world, all in one place
    Show More
    Latest News
    EU Launches Legal Action Against Spain Over Bank Merger Rules
    July 21, 2025
    Zuckerberg, Meta Executives Settle $8 Billion Privacy Lawsuit
    July 18, 2025
    Turkish Authority Opens Antitrust Probe into Mastercard and Visa
    July 18, 2025
    Malaysia Fines Three Contractors for Bid Rigging
    July 17, 2025
  • Why Join?
  • Memberships
Reading: £5 Billion Lawsuit Hits Google Over UK Search Ad Monopoly
Font ResizerAa
Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Search
  • For Lawyers
  • For Investors
  • News
  • Why Join?
  • Memberships
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
News

£5 Billion Lawsuit Hits Google Over UK Search Ad Monopoly

Editorial
Last updated: April 16, 2025 3:17 pm
Editorial
Published April 16, 2025
Share
Photo by BoliviaInteligente on Unsplash

A £5 billion ($6.25 billion) competition damages claim has been filed against Google in the UK, accusing the tech giant of abusing its dominance in the general search and search advertising markets to overcharge advertisers.

The claim, brought before the UK Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) by Or Brook Class Representative Limited, seeks compensation for thousands of UK-based advertisers who have purchased advertising space on Google’s search engine since 1 January 2011. The claimant company is wholly owned and directed by Dr Or Brook, a leading academic in competition law and an Associate Professor at the University of Leeds.

According to the filing, Google is alleged to have engaged in exclusionary conduct by forcing mobile device manufacturers and network operators to pre-install Google Search and Chrome on Android devices, and by paying Apple billions to maintain Google as the default search engine on Safari. These actions, the claim argues, have suppressed competition and inflated the prices businesses pay for online search advertising.

“This class action is about holding Google accountable for its unlawful practices and seeking compensation on behalf of UK advertisers who have been overcharged,” said Dr Brook. “Businesses have had no real choice but to rely on Google Ads for visibility, and this dominance has come at a steep cost.”

The class action is structured as an opt-out claim, meaning all eligible UK advertisers will automatically be included unless they explicitly choose to opt out.

The legal challenge is being spearheaded by Geradin Partners, a law firm known for its focus on competition law and digital markets. The counsel team includes Robert O’Donoghue KC (Brick Court Chambers), Kieron Beal KC (Blackstone Chambers), and others. The claim is further supported by expert economists including Professor Fiona Scott Morton of Yale University and Matt Hunt of AlixPartners.

Litigation funding is being provided by Burford Capital, with additional protection in place for adverse costs.

“This is the first UK claim to directly target the inflated costs faced by advertisers on Google’s search platform,” said Damien Geradin, founding partner of Geradin Partners. “We are committed to securing fair compensation for the thousands of businesses that have been harmed.”

You Might Also Like

Musk Faces FTC Antitrust Review on Twitter Purchase and 9% Stake

EU Regulator Probes Pierre Cardin for Anticompetitive Practices

Qualcomm Launches Global Antitrust Campaign Against Arm Holdings

Portugal Opens In-Depth Investigation into Idealista’s Acquisition of Portal47

Nvidia Faces Unprecedented Loss Amid AI Stock Sell-Off and Antitrust Investigation

TAGGED:Geradin PartnersgooglelawsuitOr Brook Class Representative Limitedsearch advertising marketsuk

Weekly Newsletter

Insights you can turn into money or clients
Investors

Symrise: How to benefit from a Cartel Investigation

Editorial
Editorial
July 16, 2025
New EU rules targeting Shein and Temu Likely to Benefit Zalando
Antitrust Intelligence

About Us

We identify and quantify regulatory risks so you can take better decisions
Menu
  • Lawyers
  • Investors
  • News
  • My Bookmarks
  • About Us
  • Contact
Legals
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Subscribe Us

Subscribe to our newsletter to get weekly ideas to make money and get new clients!

© 2025 Antitrust Intelligence. All Rights Reserved. - Web design Málaga by Seb creativos
Antitrust Intelligence
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Antitrust & Financial Markets? Download Your Free Guide NOW
Five tips to find unique regulatory intelligence
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?