Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Sign in
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • Home
  • Mergers
    Mergers
    Identify regulatory challenges and understand how they impact deal closing to gain the insights needed to make informed decisions.
    Show More
    Latest News
    Portugal Opens In-Depth Investigation into Idealista’s Acquisition of Portal47
    June 3, 2025
    Aura Minerals Acquires Serra Grande Gold Mine in Brazil
    June 2, 2025
    SalMar’s Wilsgård Merger Strengthens Core Operations, Yet Legal Risks Could Weigh on Stock
    June 2, 2025
    Brazil Recommends Structural Remedies for Bimbo’s Acquisition of Wickbold
    May 28, 2025
  • Market Intelligence
    Market Intelligence
    Explore the risks and opportunities arising from regulatory decisions to understand their impact on companies and markets, ensuring your company and clients benefit.
    Show More
    Latest News
    Tariffs, Lawsuits, and a Cash Crunch: Stellantis’ Risk Pile-Up
    June 3, 2025
    How Investor Filings Can Strengthen Your Legal and Strategic Arguments
    May 29, 2025
    Pets at Home Rallies on Vet Growth—But CMA Risk Lurks Larger Than for CVS
    May 28, 2025
    Grieg Seafood Slides 4% Amid Weak Q1 and Rising Legal Risks
    June 2, 2025
  • News
    News
    Stay informed with our global antitrust news compilation—bringing you the latest developments, regulatory updates, and key cases from around the world, all in one place
    Show More
    Latest News
    Chile Seeks $74M Fine Against Pedidos Ya and Glovo Over Market-Sharing Deal
    June 3, 2025
    EU Slaps €329M Fine on Delivery Hero and the Stock Price Rises. Why?
    June 3, 2025
    German Antitrust Watchdog Challenges Amazon’s Marketplace Price Controls
    June 2, 2025
    UK Begins BNPL Regulation Process, with New Rules Expected in 2026
    May 29, 2025
  • Memberships
Reading: £5 Billion Lawsuit Hits Google Over UK Search Ad Monopoly
Font ResizerAa
Antitrust IntelligenceAntitrust Intelligence
Search
  • Home
  • Mergers
  • Market Intelligence
  • News
  • Memberships
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
News

£5 Billion Lawsuit Hits Google Over UK Search Ad Monopoly

Editorial
Last updated: April 16, 2025 3:17 pm
Editorial
Published April 16, 2025
Share
Photo by BoliviaInteligente on Unsplash

A £5 billion ($6.25 billion) competition damages claim has been filed against Google in the UK, accusing the tech giant of abusing its dominance in the general search and search advertising markets to overcharge advertisers.

The claim, brought before the UK Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) by Or Brook Class Representative Limited, seeks compensation for thousands of UK-based advertisers who have purchased advertising space on Google’s search engine since 1 January 2011. The claimant company is wholly owned and directed by Dr Or Brook, a leading academic in competition law and an Associate Professor at the University of Leeds.

According to the filing, Google is alleged to have engaged in exclusionary conduct by forcing mobile device manufacturers and network operators to pre-install Google Search and Chrome on Android devices, and by paying Apple billions to maintain Google as the default search engine on Safari. These actions, the claim argues, have suppressed competition and inflated the prices businesses pay for online search advertising.

“This class action is about holding Google accountable for its unlawful practices and seeking compensation on behalf of UK advertisers who have been overcharged,” said Dr Brook. “Businesses have had no real choice but to rely on Google Ads for visibility, and this dominance has come at a steep cost.”

The class action is structured as an opt-out claim, meaning all eligible UK advertisers will automatically be included unless they explicitly choose to opt out.

The legal challenge is being spearheaded by Geradin Partners, a law firm known for its focus on competition law and digital markets. The counsel team includes Robert O’Donoghue KC (Brick Court Chambers), Kieron Beal KC (Blackstone Chambers), and others. The claim is further supported by expert economists including Professor Fiona Scott Morton of Yale University and Matt Hunt of AlixPartners.

Litigation funding is being provided by Burford Capital, with additional protection in place for adverse costs.

“This is the first UK claim to directly target the inflated costs faced by advertisers on Google’s search platform,” said Damien Geradin, founding partner of Geradin Partners. “We are committed to securing fair compensation for the thousands of businesses that have been harmed.”

You Might Also Like

Unannounced Inspections by Cyprus in Fresh Meat Retail Sector

Italian Regulator Investigates Rail Operator for Limiting SNCF’s Market Access

Italgas Acquisition of 2i Rete Gas Approved with Conditions

Apple May Face New EU Antitrust Charges in Payments

German Antitrust Watchdog Challenges Amazon’s Marketplace Price Controls

TAGGED:Geradin PartnersgooglelawsuitOr Brook Class Representative Limitedsearch advertising marketsuk
Popular News

Weekly Newsletter

Impress your colleagues, boss or clients with our weekly unique insights
News

EU Watchdog Accuses Alchem of Pharma Price Fixing

Editorial
Editorial
June 14, 2024
BBVA’s Takeover Bid for Banco Sabadell to Undergo Public Consultation
EU Regulator Probes Pierre Cardin for Anticompetitive Practices
Greek Regulator Raids Private Tutoring Centre in Antitrust Probe
Castillo Hermanos Acquires U.S.-Based Harvest Hill in $1.5 Billion Deal
Antitrust Intelligence

About US

We identify and quantify regulatory risks so you can take better decisions
Menu
  • Mergers
  • Market Intelligence
  • News
  • My Bookmarks
  • About US
  • Contact
Legals
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Subscribe US

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

© 2025 Antitrust Intelligence. All Rights Reserved. - Web design Málaga by Seb creativos
Antitrust Intelligence
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Antitrust & Financial Markets? Download Your Free Guide NOW
Five tips to find unique regulatory intelligence
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?